Kansas Medicaid Buy-In Participants Continue to Earn More and Cost Less

January, 2013

Download the PDF version of this publication. 
 


Number 14, January 2013

KANSAS MEDICAID BUY-IN PARTICIPANTS CONTINUE TO EARN MORE AND COST LESS


Authors’ Note: This Policy Brief is an update to Policy Both Number 12 published in March 2009, providing newer data on earnings, taxes and expenditures for this population. 

INTRODUCTION

The Kansas Medicaid Buy-In program, Working Healthy, was implemented in July of 2002 with the goal of providing an incentive for Kansans with disabilities to work or work more. To do so, Working Healthy allows Kansans with disabilities to maintain Medicaid coverage even if their earnings and assets exceed those generally allowed by Medicaid, with the requirement of paying a premium for that coverage when countable income exceeds 100% of the federal poverty level. When the program started, advocates, providers, policy makers and consumers all hoped that enrollees would earn more, and thus pay more taxes. Some people were concerned, however, about the cost of expanding Medicaid to an additional group of people. 

This Policy Brief summarizes research findings regarding the earnings, taxes paid, and Medicaid expenditures of people enrolled in Working Healthy (Kurth, Fall, & Hall, 2011). In a nutshell, participants report increases in hourly wages, while Medicaid costs for those continuously enrolled in the Buy-In decreased over time.

DATA

Both administrative and self-reported survey data were used to examine trends in earnings and medical expenditures. University of Kansas evaluation staff has conducted annual Satisfaction Surveys with Working Healthy participants since the program's inception, allowind for repeated measures of self-reported income levels. In addition, aggregated data from the Kansas Department of Revenue were used to track adjusted gross income and Kansas taxes paid by individuals continuously enrolled in Working Healthy. Finally, Medicaid and Medicare claims data from the Kansas Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) and the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) were used to analyze per person health care expenditure trends over time.

FINDINGS

The annual Satisfaction Survey has queried respondents about their hourly wages and employment experiences. The average self-reported hourly wage from 2007 through 2011 increased from $7.68 to $8.98 (see Figure 1), well exceeding the federal minimum wage. In general, people who remain enrolled in Working Healthy demonstrate consistent increases in income and the amount of state income taxes they pay. Because their earnings are increasing, the percentage of Working Healthy enrollees who pay a premium and the average premium amount paid have also trended upward. At the end of 2011, about 82% of enrollees paid premiums, averaging $77 per month (see Figure 2).

Further, as participants’ personal income and contributions to state revenues via taxes paid increased, medical expenditures for those continuously enrolled in Working Healthy decreased. Adjusting for medical inflation, Medicaid expenditures per person per month for this group declined over time, dropping 41% from 2007 to 2011 (see Figure 3), with the greatest decrease being in outpatient expenditures that include doctor’s visits, case management, attendant and related services.

DISCUSSION

When the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act (P.L. 106-170) was passed in 1999, establishing an option for states to implement Buy- In programs, one congressional finding listed in the law was that “For individuals with disabilities, the fear of losing health care and related services is one of the greatest barriers keeping the individuals from maximizing their employment, earning potential, and independence.” For participants in Working Healthy, access to Medicaid has allowed them to increase earnings and independence in addition to havingthe opportunity to pay taxes and premiums that offset some of their costs to Medicaid. Numerous studies (e.g., Lynch, Kaplan & Shema, 1997) have demonstrated the relationship between poverty and poor health status. The work presented here shows that, as Kansans with disabilities work more and earn more, their health status may indeed improve, as reflected in decreased medical expenditures.


Figure 1. Mean Hourly Wage of Working Healthy Participants
2007 (n=317): Federal minimum wage = $5.85; Working Healthy mean hourly wage = $7.68
2008 (n=225): Federal minimum wage = $6.55; Working Healthy mean hourly wage = $7.99
2009 (n=381): Federal minimum wage = $7.25; Working Healthy mean hourly wage = $8.68
2010 (n=377): Federal minimum wage = $7.25; Working Healthy mean hourly wage = $8.77
2011 (n=341): Federal minimum wage = $7.25; Working Healthy mean hourly wage = $8.98
From: Kurth, Fall & Hall, 2011.
Data Source: Annual Working Health Program Satisfaction Survey 

Figure 2. Percent of Working Healthy Premium Payers
2007 (N=1022): 66.9% pay premiums
2008 (N=1101): 79.4% pay premiums
2009 (N=1115): 78.3% pay premiums
2010 (N=1183): 76.8% pay premiums
2011 (N=1288): 81.6% pay premiums
Data Source: Kansas Automated Eligibility Child Support Enforcement System (KAECSES)

Figure 3. Medicaid Expenditures for Continuously Enrolled Working Healthy Participants, per Member per Month, 2007-2011 (n=268)
2007: Outpatient costs = $339.28 pmpm and Inpatient costs = $22.01 pmpm
2008: Outpatient costs = $297.60 pmpm and Inpatient costs = $47.34 pmpm
2009: Outpatient costs = $316.22 pmpm and Inpatient costs = $23.95 pmpm
2010: Outpatient costs = $294.52 pmpm and Inpatient costs = $20.88 pmpm
2011: Outpatient costs = $197.46 pmpm and Inpatient costs = $15.68 pmpm
Note: Expenditures were adjusted to 2011 for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for medical services
Data Source: Kansas Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS)

REFERENCES

Kurth, N.K., Fall, E.C. , & Hall, J.P. (2011). Working Healthy Data Chartbook 2nd Edition: Evaluation of the Kansas Medicaid Buy-In 2002-2011. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning. Available at: http:// health.kucrl.org/workinghealthy/ publications/working-healthy- data-chartbook1.
Lynch J, Kaplan G, Shema, S. Cumulative impact on sustained economic hardship of physical, cognitive, psychological and social functioning. New England Journal of Medicine 1997; 337(26):1889- 1895.


This Policy Brief is published by the KU-CRL Institute for Health & Disability Policy Studies and the KDHE Division of Health Care Financing.
KU Research & Evaluation Team
Jean P. Hal, Ph.D., Principal Investigator
Noelle K. Kurth, M.S., Senior Research Assistant
Kathleen Ireland, Student Assistant


Kansas Department of Health & Environment
Division of Health Care Finance

Mary Ellen O'Brien Wright, Senior Manager
Nancy Scott, Program Manager
Steve Curtis, Benefits Specialist Team Leader


ABOUT WORKING HEALTHY


Many people with disabilities want to work but worry that doing so could jeopardize their vital health and long term care coverage. Working Healthy offers people with disabilities who are working or interested in working the opportunity to get or keep Medicaid coverage while on the job. Through Working Healthy people can earn more, save more, achieve their career goals, and still maintain their health coverage.

Working Healthy is a Medicaid program. To qualify for this program, a person must:

  • Have a disability determined by Social Security;
  • Be no younger than 16 and no older than 64;
  • Be employed;
  • Have total income of less than 300% of the Federal Poverty Level;
  • Not be receiving Home and Community Based Services;
  • Not be living in a nursing facility; and
  • Have resources that are less than $15,000.

More information about the Working Healthy program can be found at:http://www.kdheks.gov/hcf/workinghealthy

One of 34 U.S. public institutions in the prestigious Association of American Universities
Nearly $290 million in financial aid annually
44 nationally ranked graduate programs.
—U.S. News & World Report
Top 50 nationwide for size of library collection.
—ALA
23rd nationwide for service to veterans —"Best for Vets," Military Times
KU Today